This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Construction Defect

Morada Maintenance Corp. v. Douglas E. Barnhart Inc.

Published: Jul. 23, 2005 | Result Date: Mar. 11, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: GIC791960 Verdict –  $1,563,140

Judge

Ronald L. Styn

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Douglas W. Grinnel


Defendant

Bjorn C. Green
(Demler, Armstrong & Rowland LLP)

Larry A. Shoffner

Tamara A. Laskin

David N. Bregman


Experts

Plaintiff

Larry Glicko
(technical)

Robert A. Carroll
(technical)

Defendant

Morris Crisci
(technical)

Mike Brown
(technical)

Ted Bumgardner
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff Morada Maintenance Corp., a Rancho Bernardo homeowners association, claimed that its 338-unit condominium was plagued with several defects and construction problems. The single largest problem was the condition of decks and balconies. The general contractor for the condominium, which was built between 1991 and 1993, was defendant Douglas E. Barnhart Inc. Barnhart was hired by the property owner and developer, Battle Mountain LP. Barnhart then entered into several subcontracts.

Damages

Barnhart demanded $1.75 million; Sahara's offer was $400,000.

Result

Many of the subcontractors were dismissed before trial. On the third day of pretrial hearings, the remaining defendants, except Sahara, settled with the plaintiff for a total of $4 million of which Barnhart agreed to pay $2,998,000. The trial proceeded as to Barnhart's third-party claim against Sahara. Barnhart sought to recover $2.3 million, the share attributable to settling the waterproofing issues. The court rejected Sahara's statute of limitations defense in view of Barnhart's settlement of the underlying action. The jury attributed 64 percent of the fault to Sahara, 27 percent to Barnhart, and nine percent to others. It determined the reasonable allocation of monies toward balcony and deck damages was $1,435,140, net $918,480 after allowing for Barnhart's fault and that of non-parties. The jury then awarded Barnhart an additional $128,000 in investigative costs associated with litigation. The total net verdict was $1,046,489. Sahara has been out of business for several years. Its insurers assert there is no coverage for this loss.

Deliberation

one day

Poll

12-0

Length

seven days


#93627

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390