This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Trade Secret Misappropriation

Intellisoft Ltd v. International Business Machines Corp.

Published: Aug. 24, 2013 | Result Date: Sep. 13, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 4:12-cv-1462 Bench Decision –  Dismissal with Leave

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Helen U. Kim
(Helen Kim Law, APC)

Alfredo Torrijos
(Arias, Sanguinetti, Wang & Torrijos LLP)

Mike Arias
(Arias Sanguinetti Wang & Team LLP)

J. Paul Gignac


Defendant

Erica Schulz

Peter M. Stone
(Paul Hastings LLP)


Facts

Bruce Bierman invented "Bookmark," which allowed a computer user to return their computer to a previously saved state in the event of a failure. Biermman formed Intellisoft International Inc. in 1986, to sell and/or license the Bookmark software. Following its bankruptcy, Bierman formed Intellisoft Ltd. (Intellisoft) Beginning in October 1998, Intellisoft Ltd. continually updated, refined and developed Bookmark.

Intellisoft filed a suit against IBM, asserting claims for wrongful disclosure and use of confidential information and trade secrets owned by Intellisoft relating to Bookmark.

IBM sought to dismiss the lawsuit arguing laches, lack of standing, and on statute of limitations ground.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
In 1986, International Business Machines Corp. (IBM) entered into a non-disclosure agreement with Intellisoft International. From October 1988 to about Dec. 1994, Intellisoft provided IBM with upcoming versions of the Bookmark software. The software was subject to a limited warranty and licensing agreement. Intellisoft claimed that IBM thereafter repeatedly and insistently informed Intellisoft that it was interested in licensing Bookmark. Ultimately, IBM never licensed Bookmark. Intellisoft then sued IBM in 2012, asserting claims for wrongful disclosure and use of confidential information and trade secrets owned by Intellisoft relating to Bookmark. Intellisoft also asserted claims for misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of confidence, breach of an implied-in-fact contract, unjust enrichment, intentional misrepresentation, and breach of contract.

Result

U.S. District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton denied IBM's motion to dismiss based on the doctrine of laches and lack of standing, but granted the motion on statute of limitations ground with leave to amend.


#93743

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390