This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumers Legal Remedies Act
Unfair Competition Law

Beau Hodges v. Apple Inc.

Published: Aug. 24, 2013 | Result Date: Aug. 12, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:13-cv-1128 Bench Decision –  Dismissal with Leave to Amend

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Aleksandra S. Vold

Joseph J. Siprut
(Siprut PC)

Adam J. Levitt
(DiCello Levitt)

Todd C. Atkins
(Atkins & Davidson APC)

Gregg M. Barbakoff


Defendant

Matthew D. Powers
(O'Melveny & Myers LLP)


Facts

Beau Hodges filed a consumer class action against Apple Inc. alleging violations of the California Consumer Remedies Act (CLRA), violations of the California Unfair Competition Law (UCL), and breach of contract. Hodges claimed that an Apple MacBook Pro with Retina Display (rMBP) manufactured by LG he purchased from Apple was inferior to an rMBP manufactured by Samsung. Apple filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that Hodges failed to identify any affirmative misrepresentation made by Apple.

Result

U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick granted Apple's motion to dismiss with leave to amend due to Hodge's failure to adequately state a claim for which relief may be granted.


#93770

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390