Osmar Zelaya v. RMI International Inc. and Does 1 through10
Published: Aug. 31, 2013 | Result Date: Jun. 14, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: BC480430 Verdict – Defense
Facts
Plaintiff Osmar Zelaya was hired by RMI International Inc., a security services provider, to be a lead field supervisor. Plaintiff's job was to supervise certain security personnel in the field. Plaintiff filed suit against RMI, his former employer, claiming to be a whistleblower who was fired because he reported to his supervisors and a client what he believed to be illegal billing.
Zelaya sued RMI, alleging that his termination constituted race discrimination, retaliation, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Zelaya claimed he verbally complained to RMI about what he believed to be an illegal billing. RMI denied his accusation and later terminated his employment. Zelaya argued that he was labeled as a whistleblower and that his termination was improper retaliation. He also alleged he was passed over for a promotion and was terminated because of his race and because he was from El Salvador.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued that plaintiff had no knowledge of the billing process while working for RMI and therefore his claims were not credible. Defendant also argued that despite plaintiff's claims, the plaintiff did not make any complaints of illegal billing until after he was terminated for poor performance and a conflict of interest. Therefore, the defendant could not have retaliated against the plaintiff for a complaint that he had not yet made.
Damages
Plaintiff sought more than $350,000 for his past and future lost earnings and emotional distress.
Result
The jury returned a defense verdict.
Deliberation
30 minutes
Poll
11-1
Length
four days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390