This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Sexual Harassment
Retaliation

Sally Walters v. State of California Department of Transportation and Don Reynolds

Published: Jan. 9, 1999 | Result Date: Sep. 24, 1998 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 7650293 Verdict –  $500,000

Judge

Gordon S. Baranco

Court

Alameda Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Daniel M. Siegel
(Siegel, Yee, Brunner & Mehta)

Randolph Hunter Pyle
(Hunter Pyle Law)


Defendant

Barbara J. Wills

/Renee Lias


Facts

In January 1991, Kate Baird, an environmental planner for the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) San Francisco Environmental Unit, began to subject plaintiff Sally Walters, a 44-year-old fellow environmental planner to sexual harassment. The plaintiff claimed that Baird, who had just been transferred from Caltrans' San Diego office, constantly leered at Walters, subjected her to unwelcome conversations about sex, and on several occassions grabbed Walters and rubbed her body against hers. Walters made a series of oral complaints to Caltrans supervisors, but no action was taken. At least three other employees in the Caltrans environmental mitigation unit made similar complaints. Walters then made a formal written complaint to the Caltrans EEO unit. Following that complaint, she began to suffer retaliation from her supervisor, Don Reynolds. Walters claimed that he threatened her saying that people who made complaints of sexual harassment had "no future" in his unit, and cancelled Walters' plans to attend training programs. Walters was shunned and ocstracized by some fellow employees and received obscene materials through the office mall. The informal complaint process did not lead to any relief for Walters. Finally, she made an informal written complaint to Caltrans. Following an investigation by a specially detailed state police officer, Caltrans fired Baird in May 1994. However, Walters continued to receive retaliation from some employees and supervisors, leading to her resignation from Caltrans in January 1996. She returned to work for Caltrans in 1998, at its Stockton office. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant based on hostile work environment, sexual harassment, failure to prevent and remediate sexual harassment and retaliation theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a pretrial settlement demand for $150,000. The defendants' final offer was $20,000.

Injuries

The plaintiff claimed that she suffered emotional distress.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately 2+ years after the case was filed. A mediation on March 3, 1997, before Anita Knowlton, resulted in no settlement. Defendants' motion for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict were denied on November 24, 1998. Defendants have filed a notice of appeal. Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees is pending.

Deliberation

4½ hours

Poll

11-1 (sexual harassment liability), 12-0 (failure to prevent sexual harassment), 11-1 (retaliation by Caltrans), 11-1 (retaliation by Reynolds), 10-2 (damages)

Length

seven days


#93905

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390