This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wrongful Termination

Sammie Plessel v. Hi-Shear Corporation, et al.

Published: Apr. 9, 1994 | Result Date: Mar. 25, 1994 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC001133 –  $0

Judge

Bob T. Hight

Court

L.A. Superior Torrance


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jonathan W. Biddle


Defendant

Henry J. Josefsberg
(Law Office of Henry J. Josefsberg)

Dora M. de la Rosa


Experts

Plaintiff

Michael P. Ward
(technical)

Defendant

Sinclair E. Hugh
(technical)

Alan Keltz
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff Sammie Plessel, was a 47-year-old director of industrial relations for Defendant Hi-Shear Corporation. On April 10, 1989, Defendant Leo Ragan began as Hi-Shear Corporation's new president. Because he took medication for his arthritis, his drug screen test came back positive. Plaintiff reported the result of that test to her superiors. Over the next few weeks, Defendant Ragan evaluated Plaintiff's work as unreliable and of low quality for the position. On May 16, 1989, Defendant released Plaintiff, citing a number of reasons, including the drug test incident. Plaintiff had been with Defendant corporation for 3.5 years at the time.

Settlement Discussions

Defendants contend they offered $10,000 at trial and Plaintiff demanded $95,000; withdrawn at trial. Plaintiff contends her demand remained at $95,000 throughout the litigation and Defendant offered $5,000 increased to $10,000 during trial.

Specials in Evidence

$129,000 to $187,000 range (May 16, 1989 through 1998)

Damages

Economic.

Other Information

The case-in-chief and the cross-claim both relied in part on so-called "after acquired" evidence; that is, evidence discovered only post-termination.

Deliberation

2 days

Poll

9-3 Complaint, 12-0 in Plessel's favor, on Cross-complaint

Length

2 weeks


#94370

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390