Michael Hendrix v. Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation
Published: Mar. 8, 2014 | Result Date: Oct. 2, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 2:13-cv-02402-MWF-PLA Summary Judgment – Defense
Court
USDC Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Daniel A. Osborn
(Office of the Attorney General)
Defendant
Bruce J. Berger
(Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey LLP)
Gary S. Ganchrow
(Parker Milliken Clark O'Hara & Samuelian, APC )
Facts
Michel Hendrix sued Novartis Pharmaceutical Corp.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Hendrix was diagnosed with multiple myeloma. In 1999, he was placed in a clinical trial to treat his condition, where he was infused with 4 mg of the drug Zometa. He later discontinued that treatment. In 2002, Hendrix's dentist noticed there was exposed bone in his lower right jaw. He attempted to remove and treat the dead bone and to relieve resulting pain, but he continued to suffer as a result of the bone.
Hendrix later consulted with other doctors, who believed that his Zometa treatment caused the osteonecrosis of the jaw, or ONJ. In 2007, he resumed his Zometa treatment, but took it on a much less frequent basis, to avoid another ONJ.
However, Hendrix later sued Novartis, the company behind Zometa.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Novartis moved for summary judgment, arguing that Hendrix's suit was timebarred.
Result
The court granted Novartis's motion for summary judgment.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390