This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Corporations
Shareholder Derivative
Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Laborers' Local #231 Pension Fund v. Intersil Corporation, et al.

Published: Apr. 21, 2012 | Result Date: Mar. 12, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:2011cv04093 Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Shawn A. Williams
(Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP)

Darren J. Robbins
(Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP)

Benny C. Goodman III
(Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP)

Michael W. O'Hara

Travis E. Downs III
(Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP)


Defendant

Mark P. DiPerna

Chris S. Graham

James L. Jacobs
(GCA Law Partners LLP)

Joshua D.N. Hess
(Dechert LLP)


Facts

Laborers' Local #231 Pension Fund filed a derivative suit against executives and directors of Intersil Corp., a semiconductor company in relation to the approval of an executive pay increase that occurred in the face of a poor economic situation and a negative say-on-pay vote.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that defendants were in breach of their fiduciary duty when they gave approval to a 42 percent executive pay increase even though there had been poor financial performance and a negative say-on-pay vote. Further, plaintiff alleged that defendants were not disinterested in that they could profit from the pay plan or could be liable for approval.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued that plaintiff's claims were insufficient because plaintiff failed to prove that making a pre-suit demand on the board would have been futile. Further, defendants argued that plaintiff failed to clear the hurdle of a Delaware presumption that defendants exercised good faith business judgment in the approval of the plan.

Result

The judge dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice.

Other Information

Plaintiff intends to file an amended complaint.


#96626

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390