This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Breach of Contract
Fraud

Greg Smith v. Robert H. Key, Arivest Corporation, et al.

Published: Oct. 23, 1999 | Result Date: Jul. 23, 1999 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: N077592 Bench Decision –  $435,000

Judge

Lisa Schall

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Christopher Walker

Marc C. Forsythe


Defendant

Randall E. Greer


Facts

Plaintiff Smith and defendant Key were in a partnership to purchase and resell a parcel of real property. The plaintiff found the property, negotiated with the parties, put up $50,000 to lock in the sale price with the seller and found the buyer. Key managed the mechanics of transferring the property. The sellers' interest in the property was sold to Arivest Properties and then resold to the buyer. Defendant Key failed to disclose to anyone that Arivest was not legally formed and that Key actually took an interest in the property as an individual. Corporate Realty Advisors Inc., an Arizona real estate brokerage firm, received a $520,000 commission for the sale of an interest in the property to Arivest. Arivest collected $1,350,000 for the sale of an interest in the property to the buyer. Key admitted later that he was the broker of record under his California Broker's License and not Corporate reality Advisors, Inc. After Key collected the $1,870,000, he informed plaintiff for the first time there was no half interest deal and he paid plaintiff $500,000 as a broker's fee. Key admitted that plaintiff never represented to him that plaintiff was a licensed real estate broker nor was plaintiff indentified in any of the escrow documents as a broker.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $100,000. The defendant offered $20,000.

Damages

$435,000 computed as half of $1,350,000 plus half of the fraudulently concealed $520,000 broker's fee, less a $500,000 credit for what was already paid.

Other Information

Judgment was reached one year and four months after the case was filed.


#97049

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390