This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Constitutional Law
Invasion of Privacy

William Zamora v. Escondido Union School Distrist, Nicolas Retana

Published: Aug. 19, 2000 | Result Date: May 23, 2000 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: N81401 Verdict –  $247,500

Judge

Lisa Schall

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David J. Strauss


Defendant

Randall L. Winet
(Winet, Patrick, Gayer, Creighton & Hanes ALC)


Experts

Plaintiff

Robert H. Wallace
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiff claimed that he was induced to leave a 25-year career in public education in Albuquerque to work in
Escondido Union School District (EUSD) in administrative position. After indicating that the plaintiff could
not start until after a fingerprint and background check, the defendants allowed the plaintiff to quit his job in
New Mexico.
The plaintiff moved to Escondido and commenced employment before EUSD received results from FBI, which
arrived five months after he had started his employment. The FBI revealed a 1963 felony conviction when the
plaintiff was a juvenile, for which he had received pardon in 1972. Such a conviction rendered him ineligible
for employment in California schools, regardless of pardon. In the aftermath of the discovery of felony
conviction, defendant superintendent breached confidentiality of information by sharing with a school board
member back in Albuquerque, who in turn shared the information with the Director of Personnel in
Albuquerque.
The plaintiff thereafter was turned down for five jobs he attempted to obtain in the school district where he had
been employed for 25 years.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $400,000 before trial. The defendants made no offer.

Specials in Evidence

$406,000

Deliberation

7.5 hours

Poll

12-0 (negligence), 12-0 (privacy)

Length

one week


#97236

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390