This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Breach of Contract
Arbitration Agreements

Department of Enforcement v. Charles Schwab & Co. Inc.

Published: Mar. 23, 2013 | Result Date: Feb. 21, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2011029760201 Arbitration –  Respondent

Court

FINRA


Attorneys

Claimant

Thomas B. Lawson

Daniel L. Gardner


Respondent

Patrick Conti

Gilbert R. Serota
(Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP)

Deborah Schlosberg

Julian Y. Waldo
(Supreme Court of California)


Facts

Charles Schwab & Co. amended its customer agreements to include class action waivers in October 2011, in response to the U.S. Supreme court decision in AT&T v. Concepcion. The Dept. of Enforcement filed a disciplinary action against Charles Schwab, alleging that the waivers were unlawful.

Result

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority found that the Dept. could not block respondent from including class action waivers in its customer arbitration agreements. Although it found that the waivers might have violated FINRA's own rules, it determined that the Dept. could not enforce them given that the FAA preempted them.


#97314

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390