This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
False Imprisonment
Conspiracy

Tiangan Sun v. China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation Limited

Published: May 17, 2014 | Result Date: Apr. 15, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:13-cv-05355-BRO-E Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Matthew M. Gorman

Michael Zweiback

Stephen G. Larson
(Larson LLP)

Michael M. Kowsari
(Myers Law Group APC)


Defendant

Mark E. Beck

Mark Mermelstein
(Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)

James Stengel

Laurie Weiss

Robert Loeb

John Ewald
(Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)

Xiang Wang


Facts

Tiangang Sun sued China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. Ltd., also known as Sinopec, based on events that occurred in the People's Republic of China.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Sun is an entrepreneur, who became involved with various energy and natural gas projects. Sun had a 20-year exclusivity contract to transport oil extracted from the Tahe Oil Field, but Sinopec later acquired the Oil Field and terminated Sun's contract. Sun attempted to sue Sinopec in China for breach of contract, but alleged that Sinopec then fabricated false criminal charges against him to prevent the lawsuit. Sun claimed that Sinopec did so with the collusion of various government and private coconspirators. Sun claimed that he was then detained for five years and suffered human rights violations.

In November 2012, Sun was allowed to leave Hong Kong and travel to the United States. After arriving, he contemplated filing another lawsuit, but claimed the defendants again began to engage in illegal activity to prevent him from doing so.

On July 24, 2013, Sun filed suit against Sinopec and others.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Sun had failed to properly serve notice on them and that dismissal was required under the Alien Tort Statute.

Result

The court agreed with defendants and granted its motion to dismiss.


#97977

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390