This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Race Discrimination
Hostile Work Environment

Abner Morgan Jr. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Published: Sep. 28, 2004 | Result Date: May 27, 2004 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: C9603585SI Verdict –  $500,000

Judge

Susan Y. Illston

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Pamela Y. Price

William C. McNeill

Shelley Gregory

Anthony Prince

Jory C. Steele


Defendant

Michael J. Christian

Patrick C. Mullin
(Jackson Lewis LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Richard A. Palfin
(technical)

Paul S.D. Berg
(technical)

Defendant

John DuPre
(technical)

Facts

In August 1990, Abner Morgan Jr. was hired by the National Railroad Passenger Corp. (Amtrak). Morgan, a black electrician, worked in Amtrak's Oakland maintenance yard.

Settlement Discussions

Morgan demanded $1.85 million, including attorney fees. Amtrak made no offer.

Damages

Morgan sought damages for past and future loss of earnings, and emotional distress.

Other Information

At one point of the litigation, the case made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court on Amtrak's appeal. The court held that a plaintiff invoking Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for claims of discrete discriminatory or retaliatory acts must file a charge with the EEOC within either 180 or 300 days of the date of the acts or lose the ability to recover. A charge alleging a hostile work environment, however, is timely so long as all acts constituting the claim are part of the same unlawful employment practice and at least one act falls within the limitations period. Moreover, a court may apply equitable doctrines to toll or limit the time period.

Deliberation

three days

Length

five weeks


#98150

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390