In Re Google Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
Published: Jan. 23, 2016 | Result Date: Dec. 9, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 1-14-CV-261485 Lead Case; 1-14-CV-261775; 1-14-CV-264512 Summary Judgment – Defense
Court
Santa Clara Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Joseph W. Cotchett Jr.
(Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP)
Jonathan W. Cuneo
(Cuneo, Gilbert & LaDuca LLP)
Kevin A. Seely
(Robbins LLP)
Brian J. Robbins
(Robbins LLP)
Defendant
Boris Feldman
(Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP )
Cheryl W. Foung
(Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati)
Stephen B. Strain
(Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati)
Facts
In a consolidated shareholder derivative complaint brought by plaintiffs on behalf of nominal defendant Google Inc., certain Google officers and directors were alleged to have breached their fiduciary duties to Google's stockholders.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that the individual defendants entered into "gentleman's agreements" with numerous other Silicon Valley companies to eliminate hiring competition and drive down employees' wages by agreeing not to actively recruit each other's employees.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued in their motion for summary judgment that plaintiffs' action was time barred by the statute of limitations.
Result
The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment in its entirety and dismissed the complaint with prejudice, finding that plaintiffs missed the three-year time frame within which to file their claims after the Department of Justice publicly announced a settlement with Google and other companies regarding their alleged recruiting practices involving "no cold call" agreements.
Other Information
FILING DATE: Feb. 28, 2014.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390