This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

Guy Coss, Serafin Montenegro, Ken Smiley, Steven Thibert, Mitchell Goldstein, and Torry Somers, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Hyundai Motor America, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Jan. 23, 2016 | Result Date: Aug. 31, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 8:15-cv-00237-CJC-DFM Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jae K. Kim
(Lynch Carpenter LLP)

Richard D. McCune
(McCune, Wright & Arevalo LLP)

David C. Wright
(McCune Wright Arevalo LLP)


Defendant

Ekwan E. Rhow
(Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, P.C.)

Douglas A. Fretty

Hernan D. Vera


Facts

Guy Coss, Serafin Montenegro, Ken Smiley, Steven Thibert, Mitchell Goldstein, and Terry Somers filed a putative consumer protection class action against Hyundai Motor America, in connection with Hyundai's Blue Link Service, which facilitated roadside assistance and remote diagnostics in equipped vehicles.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Hyundai's threat to disable the Hyundai Blue Link Telematics Systems for owners who failed to renew or subscribe to the service was allegedly unlawful. Plaintiffs asserted causes of action for violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, violation of the California False Advertising law, violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, breach of contract/common law warranty, fraud by concealment, negligent misrepresentation, violation of Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act for breach of express warranties, violation of Song-Beverly for breach of implied warranty of merchantability, deceit, violation of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act, violation of the Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act, violation of the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, and violation of the Rhode Island Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
It was undisputed that none of the plaintiffs has had their Systems deactivated. Therefore, defendants asserted, plaintiffs suffered no injury. Accordingly, defendant moved for summary judgment for lack of standing.

Result

The court agreed with Hyundai's standing arguments and ultimately granted Hyundai's summary judgment motion.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Feb. 10, 2015.


#98413

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390