This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Breach of Contract
Accounting Malpractice
Negligence

Pacific Coast Packaging Corporation v. Arthur Andersen & Company

Published: Jul. 30, 1994 | Result Date: Jul. 11, 1994 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: VC012081 –  $2,305,850

Judge

J. Kimball Walker

Court

L.A. Superior Norwalk


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael S. Winsten

Roland E. Bye


Defendant

Gwyn D. Quillen

Michael L. Cypers
(Glaser Weil LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Patricia L. Gleitsmann
(technical)

Defendant

James K. Loebbecke
(technical)

Facts

From 1986 to 1990, Plaintiff Pacific Coast Packaging Corporation sustained monetary losses of over $2,500,000 due to embezzlement by their former controller. During the same period, Defendant Arthur Andersen & Company performed annual financial statement audits for each year in question.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff contends it demanded $2,000,000 at the MSC and Defendant made a 998 offer of $400,000 prior to trial reduced to a waiver of costs after the third day of trial. Defendant contends that Plaintiff's only demand was $4,500,000.

Damages

Plaintiff originally sought to recover approximately $12,000,000, representing the alleged following damages: $2,500,000 embezzlement losses; $8,762,000 lost profits; $271,650 lost interest; and $300,000 fees and expenses.

Result

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Plaintiff on its professional negligence cause of action for each audit year form 1986 through 1990. The poll on the professional negligence question was 12-0. The poll on statute of limitations was in Plaintiff's favor was 12-0. The comparative negligence allocation was decided by a 9-3 vote of the jury. In addition, the jury found Plaintiff negligent by a 12-0 vote.

Other Information

The gross award of $2,305,853 was based primarily on the total amount of the embezzlement loss which could be verified by photocopied checks written by the embezzler, those which could be located from the bank. The embezzler destroyed the original embezzled checks. The bank was unable to locate the remaining portion of checks in their micro-fiche files.

Deliberation

2.5 days

Poll

varied

Length

22 days


#98838

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390