This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Negligent Supervision
Battery

George Heiner, D.D.S. v. Kmart

Published: Jul. 18, 1998 | Result Date: Jan. 23, 1998 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: H1838967 Verdict –  $3,800,000

Judge

Bonnie L. Sabraw

Court

Alameda Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven Bernard

David P. Bonaccorsi


Defendant

J. Randall Andrada


Experts

Plaintiff

Joseph M. Grant
(medical)

Arthur J. Ting
(medical)

Jeffrey G. Riopelle
(medical)

Phillip H. Allman III, Ph.D.
(technical)

John H. Christman
(technical)

Edward E. Cremata
(medical)

Robert S. Gartrell
(technical)

Defendant

Thomas C. Thomas
(technical)

John J. Lavorgna
(medical)

Facts

On March 11, 1995, plaintiff Dr. George Heiner, a 37-year-old dentist, was injured while he was a patron at defendant KMart store. The plaintiff entered the store to return a portable telephone. He provided certain personal information on a refund slip but was then informed he could not return the phone because his credit card charge slip did not meet the requirement of a "sales receipt." The plaintiff requested return of his personal information which was denied, so he picked up the bundle of refund slips from the counter and walked toward the exit. The defendant's security guard followed him, a scuffle ensued, and the plaintiff was held until police arrived. The police refused to arrest him because no crime had been commited. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant based on negligent hiring, supervision and training; and battery theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a settlement demand for $1.8 million. The defendant made an offer of compromise for $10,000.

Specials in Evidence

$25,000 approximately $4.7 million

Injuries

The plaintiff alleged a torn rotator cuff with shoulder impingement, and residual lifetime disability. He underwent surgery in March 1997 which partially corrected the condition.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately three years after the incident. POST-TRIAL MOTIONS: The defendant's motion for a new trial was denied. The defendant has appealed.

Deliberation

one day

Poll

varied

Length

22 days


#99044

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390