This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Non-Vehicular)
Professional Negligence
Medical Malpractice

Katherine Ann Arroyo v. George Clark M.D., dba Alvarado Center for Surgical Weight Control

Published: Jul. 12, 2001 | Result Date: Mar. 27, 2001 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 729970 Verdict –  $275,000

Judge

John S. Meyer

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

R. Craig Clark


Defendant

Glen F. Dorgan
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Experts

Plaintiff

Edward Livingston
(medical)

Defendant

James Champion
(medical)

Facts

The plaintiff, Katherine Arroyo, underwent a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure on Jan. 20, 1998. Gastric bypass is a weight reduction surgical procedure in which the stomach is divided into two parts. The small intestine is divided below the stomach and the lower part of that intestine is pulled up and attached to the part of the stomach where the food enters through the esophagus. This surgical connection between the bowel and the stomach "pouch" is called an anastomosis. This stomach "pouch" is made very small (about the size of a thumb) which greatly restricts the amount of food the patient can eat, thus causing weight loss. The distal portion of the stomach and the small intestine outlet are reconnected with the bowel down below (thus forming the "Y"). Very few doctors performed this procedure with a laparoscopic approach in 1998. Dr. Clark and his partner claim to have invented the laparoscopic approach to the Roux-en-Y surgery. The plaintiff suffered a stricture of the anastomosis and had to be fed intravenously for several months. She underwent a successful additional surgery to enlarge the stricture.

Damages

The plaintiff was employed at her family owned tennis club. She was paid during any time off. There was no claim for economic damages. General damages were limited to $250,000 under MICRA.

Injuries

The plaintiff suffered a stricture of the anastomosis at the surgical connection between the stomach pouch and the intestines. The plaintiff was advised against attempting to have the surgery reversed due to possible complications.

Deliberation

1.5 days

Poll

12-0 (no breach of the standard of care), 10-2 (breach of duty of providing informed consent), 9-3 (causation), 10-2 (damages)

Length

six days


#99298

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390