This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
ADA
Unreasonable Use of Deadly Force

Barbara Williams and E. Paul Williams, individually and as successor-in-interest of Bartholomew P. Williams v. The Board of Trustees of California State University, Jimmie Brown, Leandre Fields, Helen Skaggs, Matthew Verhulst, and Does 4 through 10, individually

Published: Aug. 30, 2014 | Result Date: Jul. 31, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:13-cv-00408-JGB-OP Settlement –  $2,500,000

Court

USDC Eastern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kaveh Navab
(Navab Law)

Kunti Dudakia

V. James DeSimone
(V. James DeSimone Law)


Defendant

Celine M. Cooper
(Office of the Attorney General)

Michael E. Whitaker


Facts

Barbara Williams and E. Paul Williams, individually, and as successor-in-interest of Bartholomew Williams, sued the Board of Trustees of California State University, Jimmie Brown, Leandre Fields, Helen Skaggs, and Matthew Verhulst, in connection with the shooting death of a student.

Plaintiffs' son, Bartholomew Williams, was a 38-year old graduate student who suffered from bipolar disorder.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs' claimed that on Dec. 8, 2012, their son experienced confusion and distress. In response to a disturbance call, three officers went to Bartholomew's dorm room when a struggle ensued. Plaintiffs claimed that police officers repeatedly sprayed him with pepper spray and beat him over 40 times with their batons. The officers then shot at Bartholomew, killing him.

Plaintiffs sued defendants, asserting claims of unreasonable use of deadly force, civil rights violations, disability discrimination, wrongful death, and negligence. Plaintiffs also claimed that the CSU San Bernardino Police Department officers were inadequately trained on how to interact with mentally ill students in distress.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended that Williams initially agreed to speak with a doctor about his issues. However, a struggle ensued when the officers attempted to transport him to a hospital for psychological evaluation.

Defendants denied plaintiffs' allegations, and asserted various affirmative defenses. Defendants contended that the officer's actions were justified as a result of Bart Williams' alleged violent actions towards the responding officers, including stomping on the head and chest of an officer and using pepper spray against officers. San Bernardino County District Attorney's independent investigation of the incident concluded that the officers' actions amounted to self-defense and defense of others in light of Bart Williams' violent actions towards the officers.

Result

The parties reached a $2.5 million settlement. In addition to the monetary relief, defendants also agreed to institute policy changes with respect to its crisis intervention policies, including requiring police officers to undergo a minimum of 32 hours of Crisis Intervention Training.


#99643

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390