This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement
Unfair Business Practices

Applied Medical Resources Corporation v. Tyco Healthcare Group LP dba Covidien

Published: Sep. 6, 2014 | Result Date: Jul. 25, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 8:11-cv-01406-JVS-AN Bench Decision –  Plaintiff

Facts

Applied Medical Resources Corp. sued Tyco Healthcare Group LP, doing business as Covidien, in connection with a patent dispute.

Meanwhile, Gaya Ltd., Covidien LP, and Covidien Sales's sought a determination with respect to the inventorship concerning certain patents held by Applied. Gaya filed an unjust enrichment and conversion claim against Applied.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed rights to U.S. Patent No. 8,016,755 (Patent '755) entitled "Surgical Access Apparatus and Method." Plaintiff accused defendant of infringing its patent, both directly and indirectly, by making, offering for sale, or otherwise making available products that infringed on one or more claims under the patent. Particularly, plaintiff claimed that defendant infringed on its patent through its product, the "SILS Port" and related products as well as by promoting the "SILS Procedures." Plaintiff claimed that the SILS Port was a surgical access device used in performing laparoscopic surgical procedures, which entailed certain claims under plaintiff's patent. Plaintiff alleged that defendant's acts of infringement were undertaken without permission or license from Applied. Plaintiff asserted a claim for patent infringement, and sought a declaratory judgment and an injunction against defendant.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant denied plaintiff's allegations, and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Result

With respect to Gaya's claims against Applied, the court concluded that federal patent law preempted Gaya's claims of unjust enrichment and conversion. The court also concluded that Gaya and Covidien failed to prove that any individual associated with Gaya was a sole or joint inventor of any of the inventions claimed by Applied, including Patent '755 and four others. The court also determined that Gaya and Covidien lacked standing to pursue a determination whether the named inventors were misjoined. Moreover, the court ruled that all remaining claims and defenses of Applied and Covidien would be adjudicated in future proceedings.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Sept. 13, 2011.


#99653

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390