Gloria Beltran, an individual for herself and on behalf of the public v. Daniel A. Jardini, M.D., a California Corporation, Daniel A. Jardini, M.D., an individual
Published: Sep. 9, 2006 | Result Date: Jun. 16, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: M 70541 Verdict – Defense
Court
Monterey Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Michael P. Masuda
(Noland, Hamerly, Etienne & Hoss PC)
Experts
Plaintiff
Warren Nishimoto
(medical)
Facts
Plaintiff Gloria Beltran, 50s, worked as an office manager at the family medicine office of defendant Dr. Daniel Jardini. Since she started working with defendant in 1994, she and defendant had open and straightforward discussions about work. The plaintiff claimed she was terminated in July 2003 during one such discussion.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff sued the defendant, claiming wrongful termination. She alleged the termination was in retaliation and in violation of public policy. The plaintiff also alleged violation of Business and Professions Code Section 17200. She contended she was terminated for demanding to be paid overtime in the future if she worked overtime.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant denied the plaintiff's allegations. He admitted that he stated, "You're fired," but insisted that he retracted the statement and re-offered the plaintiff her job a few minutes later. The defendant asserted that it was the plaintiff's decision to leave her position and opined that she wanted to be fired. He further contended that the discussion leading to plaintiff's termination had nothing to do with overtime. He stated the office manager position, which included the power to make decisions about the office's operation, was a managerial level job. Thus, the plaintiff was not entitled to overtime. This contention was supported by testimony from the current office manager and two former employees.
Settlement Discussions
The plaintiff's demand at trial was $32,500; defendant's offer was $15,000 (C.C.P. Section 998).
Damages
The plaintiff asked for approximately $9,000 in closing arguments. The defense disputed damages and injuries, noting that the plaintiff failed to offer proof that she worked overtime or received treatment for her depression.
Injuries
The plaintiff claimed she suffered from depression and sought $25,000 to $100,000 for her pain and suffering.
Result
The jury found in favor of defendant, finding no retaliation and no overtime due to plaintiff.
Other Information
Defendant was awarded costs of $5,500.
Deliberation
one hour
Poll
10-2 (rejecting retaliation), 11-1 (rejecting overtime)
Length
four days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390