Estate of Valente Jacquez v. Supershuttle Ontario
Published: Sep. 30, 2006 | Result Date: May 11, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: KC045861 Verdict – $5,632,410
Court
L.A. Superior Pomona
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Douglas E. Kottler
(Kottler & Kottler)
Gary A. Dordick
(Dordick Law Corporation)
Defendant
Experts
Plaintiff
Ted M. Kobayashi
(technical)
Frank A. Perez Ph.D.
(technical)
Peter Formuzis Ph.D.
(technical)
Defendant
Timothy J. Reust
(technical)
Anthony C. Stein Ph.D.
(technical)
Stephanie R. Rizzardi-Pearson
(technical)
Facts
It was raining, as it had been off and on all night, while decedent, Valente Jacquez was driving his truck down the freeway, at about 3 a.m. Pete Rodriguez was also driving down the freeway in the course and scope of his employment for Supershuttle Ontario. The decedent lost control of his truck. It eventually collided with the center divider, and came to rest sideways across the median and left lane. Rodriguez' van approached in the left lane and collided with the truck. The decedent was fatally injured. His wife and four children sued Rodriguez and Supershuttle for negligence.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS’ CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs claimed that Rodriguez was not paying attention. They claimed that the rain was light at the time of the accident, and that Rodriguez should have seen the decedent's headlight. One of the truck's headlights was smashed when the truck struck the median, but the plaintiffs argued that the other was intact and partially visible.
DEFENDANT’S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant claimed that the decedent's truck was not visible. Rodriguez was driving 55 miles per hour, and the van's headlights could only illuminate up to 150 feet ahead of it, thus it argued Rodriguez could not have had enough time to react to the truck's unexpected presence once he saw it.
Settlement Discussions
The plaintiffs demanded $1.5 million; the defendant offered $200,000.
Specials in Evidence
$632,408
Damages
The plaintiffs sought an unspecified sum for the loss of society of their husband and father. The family was close-knit. The parents had been married for 25 years. Two children still lived at home, and the remaining two remained close to the family. They celebrated holidays together and took vacations together.
Result
The jury found the decedent 50 percent at fault, and the defendant 50 percent at fault. It calculated the plaintiff's damages at $5,632,408, which was reduced to $2,816,204.
Other Information
The plaintiff was also awarded $276,036 in costs. The defendant's motion for a new trial was denied.
Deliberation
one day
Length
seven days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390