Appellate Practice,
Letters
Sep. 23, 2014
Tentative rulings aren't so "far-fetched"
Especially given that one division is already doing it. By Ciarán O'Sullivan
Ciarán O’Sullivan
Ciarán has litigated trusts and estates disputes in trial and appellate courts since 1998. He is a member of the executive committee of the California Lawyers Association's Trusts and Estates section.
I thought the recent article in which I was mentioned, "Appellate lawyers renew call for tentative rulings," Sept. 19, was interesting, balanced and well-written.
But I must take minor issue with the subheading describing the idea as "far-fetched," especially since one division already uses the procedure we voted for, and many justices and appellate practitioners favor it. The resolution is unlikely to be implemented by the Judicial Council anytime soon, for sure, but that doesn't...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In