For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Constitutional Law,
U.S. Supreme Court

Jul. 14, 2011

Protecting the rich in the election system

The U.S. Supreme Court conservative majority makes clear their desire to protect the influence of the wealthy in the election process. By Erwin Chemerinsky of UC Irvine, School of Law

Erwin Chemerinsky

Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law
UC Berkeley School of Law

Erwin's most recent book is "Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism." He is also the author of "Closing the Courthouse," (Yale University Press 2017).


The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, 2011 DJDAR 9489 (June 27, 2011), reflects the conservative majority's hostility to campaign finance regulation and its desire to protect the influence of the wealthy in the electoral process. Although the Court is careful to say that it is not invalidating all forms of public funding of elections, the practical effect will be to reduce greatly the likelihood ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up



By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.