LOS ANGELES - Imposing a parole-revocation fine enacted two years after a defendant committed the underlying offenses is unconstitutional, an appellate court ruled Tuesday.
The retroactive fine improperly increases punishment for a crime, the 2nd District Court of Appeal held. People v. Callejas, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13401 (Cal. App. 2nd. Dist. Dec. 19, 2000).
The retroactive fine improperly increases punishment for a crime, the 2nd District Court of Appeal held. People v. Callejas, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13401 (Cal. App. 2nd. Dist. Dec. 19, 2000).
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



