Litigation
Mar. 22, 2016
The use of undisclosed experts on summary judgment
A Court of Appeal recently held that a trial court properly excluded a plaintiff's expert declarations on summary judgment where the plaintiff had not participated in the exchange of expert information. By Melissa R. McCormick
The California Court of Appeal recently held that a trial court properly excluded a plaintiff's expert declarations on summary judgment where the plaintiff had not participated in the exchange of expert information. Perry v. Bakewell Hawthorne LLC, 2016 DJDAR 1161 (Feb. 3, 2016). Perry contains helpful lessons for practitioners who find themselves filing or opposing summary judgment motions after an expert...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In