Intellectual Property,
Law Practice,
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr. 17, 2013
Back in state court: patent-based malpractice
The high court's opinion in Gunn v. Minton appears to put an end to the fairly brief period of federal court "arising under" jurisdiction in patent-based legal malpractice cases.
Jonathan W. Hughes
Partner
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
3 Embarcadero Ctr Fl 10
San Francisco , CA 94111
Phone: (415) 471-3156
Fax: (415) 471-3400
Email: jonathan.hughes@apks.com
UC Hastings COL; San Francisco CA
CALIFORNIA PRACTICE: This is a monthly column devoted to the issues that impact California attorneys, both in-house and outside counsel, in their daily practices. For more information, please visit www.arnoldporter.com.
On Feb. 20, Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the unanimous opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Gunn v. Minton, No. 11-1118. The opinion appears to put an end to the fairly brief period of federal court "arising under" jurisdiction in patent-based le...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In