The courts have again ventured into the turbulent waters of anti-SLAPP litigation in the ongoing controversy over whether lawyers can secure early dismissal of legal malpractice actions.
On Dec. 2, 2009, in PediWave Corp. v Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP (2009 DJDAR 16858), the 6th Appellate District reversed the granting of special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute, Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16. PediWave had sued its former lawyers for failin...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In