This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,
Appellate Practice,
California Supreme Court,
Labor/Employment

Sep. 3, 2016

State high court will likely adopt federal de minimis rule

The 9th Circuit recently asked the California Supreme Court to answer whether the federal "de minimis rule" for wage actions — whereby employees cannot seek compensation for "negligible" time worked — applies in California.

Felix Shafir

Partner
Horvitz & Levy LLP

Appellate Law

Email: fshafir@horvitzlevy.com

Felix's practice focuses on the defense of class and representative actions.

See more...

Decades ago, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a "de minimis rule" for employees' federal wage claims seeking compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act for "negligible" time worked. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692 (1946). Thus, in FLSA cases, employees generally "cannot recover for otherwise compensable time if it is de minimis." $95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up