Family
Nov. 20, 1999
Family Law: 'Roe' Wades Into Custody Tiff
^^Family Law^^ By Erin O'Bryan This week, Danni Lipton represents Carnell Hall in a child support action brought by a woman with whom he had a fling. Hall complains that, since he had no intention of fathering the child, he shouldn't have to pay support. Lipton asserts this position by (mis)using Roe v. Wade to argue that Hall should have been given the choice to be a parent. And since he would not have chosen fatherhood, he shouldn't have to pay child support.
By Erin O'Bryan
This week, Danni Lipton represents Carnell Hall in a child support action brought by a woman with whom he had a fling. Hall complains that, since he had no intention of fathering the child, he shouldn't have to pay support. Lipton asserts this position by (mis)using Roe v. Wade to argue that Hall should have been given the choice to be a parent. And...
This week, Danni Lipton represents Carnell Hall in a child support action brought by a woman with whom he had a fling. Hall complains that, since he had no intention of fathering the child, he shouldn't have to pay support. Lipton asserts this position by (mis)using Roe v. Wade to argue that Hall should have been given the choice to be a parent. And...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In