The State Bar of California has taken the position that under its Rule 2.30 an attorney (which would include those retired judges still holding Bar membership) serving as a private arbitrator is engaged in the practice of law and therefore must be on active rather than inactive status. This is because under Rule 2.30 the Bar has determined that an inactive attorney serving as a private arbitrator would be engaged in the unauthorized practice of law since that rule prohibits an inact...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In