Some legal areas are consistently predictable. Other areas "ebb and flow" - for instance, the rules with respect to the recovery of punitive damages. Those rules long favored the plaintiff, but recently have somewhat tilted towards the defendant.
Another example is policyholder versus broker. For a while, the latter generally prevailed over the former. Yet, as explained below, the tide has turned. The latest such example is Williams v. Hilb, Royal & Hobbs Ins. Svcs., 2009...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In