This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance

Nov. 21, 2009

Trending Against the Broker

The law is no longer favoring brokers over policyholders.

Some legal areas are consistently predictable. Other areas "ebb and flow" - for instance, the rules with respect to the recovery of punitive damages. Those rules long favored the plaintiff, but recently have somewhat tilted towards the defendant.

Another example is policyholder versus broker. For a while, the latter generally prevailed over the former. Yet, as explained below, the tide has turned. The latest such example is Williams v. Hilb, Royal & Hobbs Ins. Svcs., 2009...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails