What happens when a litigant presents an inflated attorney fee request based on a low jury verdict to a trial court? The answer may be found in Chavez v. City of Los Angeles (2010) 47 Cal.4th 970, a case that is unarguably a victory for California employers, but one with limited applicability to most Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) cases. Defense lawyers hoping to successfully apply the reasoning of Chavez to gut attorney fee motions whenever a jury awards a FEHA pl...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



