This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Family

Dec. 19, 2015

Don't reserve jurisdiction over spousal support orders to infinity

Reserving jurisdiction over temporary spousal support deserves a place in the family law toolbox, but it's no fix-all and should not be allowed to derail the trial. By Nathan Scott

West Justice Center

Nathan R. Scott

Judge

Civil Panel

See more...

By Nathan Scott

Sometimes the tail wags the dog. Sometimes a family law case comes for trial - trial with a capital "T," trial for judgment, trial for final resolution - and the most hotly disputed issue ends up being retroactive temporary spousal support.

With that, trial grinds to a halt. It shifts focus away from moving the parties forward. Instead, the parties spend substantial time and effort not to show what they need today, ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up