Labor/Employment
Jul. 13, 2000
Hat Trick
While employment in California is "at will," employers must be careful to avoid implied good-cause contracts.
By Douglas A. Wickham
The California Supreme Court has added another layer of restriction on the employment relationship in Asmus v. Pacific Bell, 23 Cal.4th 1 (2000). That case, together with Foley v. Interactive Data Corp., 47 Cal.3d 654 (1988), and Scott v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co., 11 ...
The California Supreme Court has added another layer of restriction on the employment relationship in Asmus v. Pacific Bell, 23 Cal.4th 1 (2000). That case, together with Foley v. Interactive Data Corp., 47 Cal.3d 654 (1988), and Scott v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co., 11 ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In