This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law,
Government

May 12, 2015

Door to campaign finance regulation

Does a recent decision by the U.S. high court represent the beginning of a new jurisprudence in the area of campaign finance law?

Erwin Chemerinsky

Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law
UC Berkeley School of Law

Erwin's most recent book is "Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism." He is also the author of "Closing the Courthouse," (Yale University Press 2017).

See more...

The U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Williams-Yulee v. Florida State Bar recognizes the corrosive effects of money in judicial elections and offers a glimmer of hope that this may be the beginning of a new jurisprudence in the area of campaign finance law. At the very least, this decision provides a basis for allowing regulations of fundraising in judicial elections that would not be allowed in other types of election campaigns. But more ge...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up