Administrative/Regulatory,
Constitutional Law,
Government,
Immigration,
Judges and Judiciary,
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct. 3, 2017
Judge's 'heartless' claim is flawed
We’ve known for a long time that some members of the judiciary rule from emotion rather than the law, but in most instances, they at least try to appear as though they are following the law.
John C. Eastman
Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence c/o Chapman Law School
1 University Dr
Orange , CA 92866
Phone: (714) 628-2587
Email: jeastman@chapman.edu
Univ of Chicago Law School
Dr. John C. Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service at Chapman University's Fowler School of Law, and founding director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence.
FIRST PRINCIPLES
We’ve known for a long time that some members of the judiciary rule from emotion rather than the law, but in most instances, they at least try to appear as though they are following the law.
Not so, apparently, with Judge Nicholas Garaufis, the Clinton-appointed federal district judge on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York whose docket now includes the class action c...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In