Appellate Practice,
California Courts of Appeal,
Letters,
Civil Litigation
Dec. 7, 2017
Simple remedy left out of column
Steven Kruis' article bringing to our attention a recent opinion dealing with the enforcement of settlement agreements is helpful, but it left something out.
Steven Kruis' article bringing to our attention the Sayta v. Chu opinion (2017 DJDAR 11269) is helpful. ["Retained jurisdiction essential to enforce settlement agreement," Dec. 5, 2017]. However, Mr. Kruis fails to discuss a simple remedy to the problem facing settling party seeking to invoke the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6. The problem presented to the Sayta court was that the record fail...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In