California Supreme Court,
Law Practice
Dec. 8, 2017
State Supreme Court hears arguments on firm’s unfinished business
Arguments before the state Supreme Court Thursday addressed the issue of whether a dissolved law firm can collect hourly fees on an unfinished case when that case is being undertaken by a new firm.
LOS ANGELES — Arguments before the state Supreme Court on Thursday addressed the issue of whether a dissolved law firm can collect hourly fees on an unfinished case when it is being undertaken by a new firm.
Who owns a client’s legal matters? Is it the firm, lawyer or clients? Heller Ehrman LLP, which went bankrupt in the late 2000s, filed suit against four other law firms as a way to pay back creditors.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In