State Bar & Bar Associations,
California Supreme Court,
Law Practice
May 25, 2018
Attorney re-fingerprinting story is quite disturbing
The critical paragraph reads “Many of the state’s 190,000 active lawyers must be re-fingerprinted because for more than 25 years the Bar did not keep the prints of all of admission applicants as required by law.”
Nathaniel J. Friedman
Law Office of Nathaniel J. Friedman
8500 Wilshire Blvd Ste 910
Beverly Hills , CA 90211
Phone: (310) 277-2889
Fax: (310) 277-2136
Email: njfriedman@medlawyer.net
Southwestern Univ School of Law
Author of "Medical Malpractice in the 21st Century"
The May 24 Daily Journal article, "State high court says lawyers must pay for re-fingerprinting," is quite disturbing.
The critical paragraph reads "Many of the state's 190,000 active lawyers must be re-fingerprinted because for more than 25 years the Bar did not keep the prints of all of admission applicants as required by law." (Emphasis added)
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In