9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,
California Supreme Court,
Labor/Employment
May 9, 2019
Vazquez ‘guidance’ throws future plaintiffs a bone or 2
The 9th Circuit does not explicitly tell the remanding district court how to rule. But it comes close by describing the appropriate analytical framework and populating it with the facts necessary to support a conclusion that Jan-Pro cleaners would be properly classified as employees.
Tamarah P. Prevost
Senior Associate
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP
Email: tprevost@cpmlegal.com
Tamarah practices employment law, representing victims of racial discrimination, sexual harassment, and other civil rights abuses. She also maintains an active class action practice in antitrust and consumer rights litigation.
Most plaintiff employment lawyers are now intimately familiar with Dynamex, the California Supreme Court case setting the "ABC test" for classifying independent contractors as employees. On May 2 in Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Intern...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In