For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
Criminal

Oct. 28, 2019

Official records hearsay exception

The objective of this article and self-study test is to review the law regarding the official records exception to the hearsay rule: EC Sections 1280-1284.

Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse

Elia V. Pirozzi

Assigned Judge

Criminal

See more...

Shutterstock

In both civil and criminal cases, official records are often necessary to establish essential facts. When the records are used to prove the truth of the matter that they relate, they are considered hearsay and must meet the foundational ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up

Related Content

Civil Procedure

Bhatt v. State Dept. of Health Services

Reports prepared by fiscal intermediary on behalf of government agency qualify as official record.

Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Ramos

Use of deceased jailhouse informant's previous testimony in defendant's death penalty retrial isn't error.

Criminal Law and Procedure

Shea v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Forensic alcohol report prepared by unsupervised trainee can't qualify under public employee exception to hearsay rule.

Administrative Agencies

Furman v. DMV

DMV's forensic alcohol analysis was not sufficient competent evidence to support suspension of driving privilege.

Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Martinez

Uncertified computer printouts reporting felon's criminal history are admissible as evidence under official records exception to hearsay rule.

Administrative Agencies

Murphey v. Shiomoto

Suspension of DUI arrestee’s driver’s license reinstated after trial court committed reversible error in determining arresting officer’s reports inadmissible and granting driver’s writ pe...

Municipal Law

Coe v. City of San Diego

Operator of nude entertainment business unsuccessful in overturning denial of petition for administrative mandate, where city's laws applicable to such businesses not void for vagueness.

Civil Procedure

Glatman v. Valverde

Lapse of one week between DUI arrest and certification of defendant's blood test results is too long to satisfy public record hearsay exception.

Administrative Agencies

Gregory v. State Board of Control

State Board of Control must obtain crime report from law enforcement, if not obtained by victim, under Victims of Crime Restitution Program.

Administrative Agencies

Miyamoto v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles

Lab report is admissible under public employee records exception where report stated that results were recorded at time of analysis.

Administrative Agencies

Molenda v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles

Lab report containing alcohol blood test results properly deemed inadmissible hearsay in DMV administrative proceeding.

Constitutional Law

Rupf v. Yan

Law that permits confiscation of firearms from mentally unstable individual is constitutional.

Civil Procedure

Christian Research Institute v. Alnor

For defamation claim to survive anti-SLAPP motion, public figures must demonstrate falsity by preponderance of evidence, and malice by clear and convincing evidence.

Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Delgado

Abstract of judgment describing defendant's prior serious felony conviction as "Asslt w DWpn" is upheld as reliable for purposes of enhancing sentence.

Real Property

Donley v. Davi

Unrestricted real estate license is properly denied on grounds of moral turpitude where applicant domestically abused girlfriend.

Civil Procedure

AO Alpha-Bank v. Yakovlev

Service of process must be reasonably calculated to provide actual notice under the circumstances of the case in order to satisfy due process

Criminal Law and Procedure

Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts

Admission of analysis certificates proving substance seized was cocaine and showing amount recovered is violation of defendant's right to confrontation.

Criminal Law and Procedure

Crawford v. Washington

Use of defendant's wife's statements at trial violated confrontation clause.



By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.