This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,
Criminal

May 5, 2020

Countless fraud prosecutions called into question

9th Circuit invalidates its own model intent-to-defraud jury instruction in new ruling.

Ashwin J. Ram

Steptoe & Johnson LLP

Email: aram@steptoe.com

Univ of Kansas SOL; Lawrence KS

See more...

Laurie Edelstein

partner
Jenner & Block

energy & complex commercial litigation

455 Market St #2100
San Francisco , CA 94105

Yale Law School

See more...

Bruce C. Bishop

Steptoe & Johnson LLP

See more...

Reem Sadik

Steptoe & Johnson LLP

See more...

Thousands of fraud cases requiring proof of an intent to defraud have been charged in federal courts in California and the eight other states within the jurisdiction of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The intent-to-defraud requirement is a critical element to separate criminal conduct from commonplace business and social practices and norms.

The 9th Circuit's recent decision in $95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up