Appellate Practice,
Judges and Judiciary,
Letters
Feb. 1, 2021
Court website undermines comments about delay in the 3rd District
I write to address comments by three appellate specialists in the Daily Journal’s January 29 article, “Complaint against 3rd District justices divides attorneys,” on my recent complaint to the Commission on Judicial Performance about extraordinary decisional delay by Court of Appeal Justices Raye, Blease and Murray during the past three years.
Jon B. Eisenberg
Email: jon@eisenbergappeals.com
Jon is a retired appellate attorney and the author of California Practice Guide: Civil Appeals and Writs.
I write to address comments by three appellate specialists in the Daily Journal's January 29 article, "Complaint against 3rd District justices divides attorneys," on my recent complaint to the Commission on Judicial Performance about extraordinary decisional delay by Court of Appeal Justices Raye,
Or access this article for $45
Already a subscriber?
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Appellate Practice, California Courts of Appeal, Judges and Judiciary
Judicial Council report shows 3rd District lags in resources and issued opinions
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Appellate Practice, Judges and Judiciary
Appellate lawyers task force to study decision delays
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Appellate Practice, California Courts of Appeal, Judges and Judiciary
Complaint against 3rd District justices divides attorneys
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Appellate Practice, California Courts of Appeal, Judges and Judiciary
Complaint to watchdog says 3 appellate justices are too slow
By Malcolm Maclachlan