This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation

Mar. 10, 2021

California Supreme Court poised to consider anti-SLAPP catch-all framework

Later this term, Geiser v. Kuhns will present the court an opportunity to clarify what must be shown to establish anti-SLAPP protection.

Ryan G. Baker

Waymaker LLP

See more...

Scott M. Malzahn

Waymaker LLP

Phone: (424) 652-7800

Email: smalzahn@waymakerlaw.com

See more...

Chloe George

Waymaker LLP

See more...

Two years ago, the California Supreme Court unanimously decided FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc. In that opinion, the court established a two-step framework to determine whether a defendant's alleged speech or other conduct is protected under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16(e)(4) (the "catch-all provision") of California's anti-SLAP...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up