Civil Litigation
Jun. 24, 2021
Defense bar takes (3rd) swing at high court review of McGill rule
H&R Block recently filed a cert petition that attempts to persuade the United States Supreme Court to grant review of California’s rule holding that an arbitration agreement is invalid if it would bar the plaintiff’s access to public injunctive relief in any forum.
Glenn A. Danas
Clarkson Law Firm P.C.Employment; Class Action Litigation; Appellate Advocacy
Phone: (213) 788-4050
Email: gdanas@clarksonlawfirm.com
Emory Univ SOL; Atlanta GA
Glenn focuses on appeals and major motions, and has substantial experience litigating consumer and employment class actions. Mr. Danas was named one of the Top 100 Attorneys in California in 2017 by the Daily Journal, and received a California Lawyer Attorney of the Year (CLAY) award in 2015 for his work on Iskanian
In HRB Tax Group, Inc. v. Snarr, defendant H&R Block recently filed a cert petition that attempts to persuade the United States Supreme Court to grant review of California's McGill rule.
To recap, the McGill rule refers to the California Supreme Court's decision in McGill v. Citibank N.A., 393 P.3d 85 (2017), holding t...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In