This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Sep. 21, 2021

Journey to the Center of the Fourth (Amendment)

But just as mantle and core underlie the earth’s crust, there is much more going on beneath the surface of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision regarding the “hot pursuit” exception to the warrant requirement.

2nd Appellate District, Division 2

Brian M. Hoffstadt

Associate Justice
California Court of Appeal

UCLA School of Law, 1995

See more...

In Lange v. California, 141 S. Ct. 2011 (2021), the United States Supreme Court held that police may not follow a suspected misdemeanant into his home without a warrant just because they were in "hot pursuit."

On its surface, Lange merely holds that "hot pursuit" is an exigency excusing the warrant requirement onl...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up