Can an expert opinion, expressing a novel scientific theory but not utilizing a novel scientific methodological technique or process, pass muster under Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern California (2012) 55 Cal.4th 747 (Sargon) yet be inadmissible under People v. Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24 (Kelly)? That issue is discussed at length in the recent First District Court of Appeals decision, Bader v. Johnson & Johns...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In