A damages retrial to determine how much Tesla Inc. must pay a former subcontractor for emotional distress from racist harassment drew to a close Friday after opposing counsel gave final arguments to the eight jurors.
J. Bernard Alexander III, an attorney for plaintiff Owen Diaz, told the jury Tesla was conclusively determined by a prior jury to have erred by allowing a “plantation mentality” to develop at its Fremont factory and the juror...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In