In a recent opinion, the appellate court reversed a trial court's no-bail order. (Yedinak v. Superior Court of Riverside County (2023 DJDAR 6231.) Like many post-Humphrey reversals, the trial court failed to articulate necessary findings to justify the decision. (See In re Humphrey (2021) 11 Cal. 5th 135.) Why does this repeatedly happen?
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



